tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17500930.post471825899396604454..comments2024-03-20T22:57:03.923+00:00Comments on Dean Bubley's Disruptive Wireless: Optimised Internet apps. vs. RCS vs. multi-headed clientsDean Bubleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05719150957239368264noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17500930.post-55064720976816604262010-06-13T19:54:27.098+01:002010-06-13T19:54:27.098+01:00it really is not about whether you have a multihea...it really is not about whether you have a multiheaded client or not. And it is silly to suggest interop is not important. I guess you don't really mean to imply that. And as a previous anonymous said there are very successful multiheaded comms clients. So interop is good. But just because one has interop one doesn't get customers. Isn't it in the end more about charging: charging for these services is where the problem is. so the mistake with rcs etc is that the operator should go for the cheapest way of delivering and achieving interop. The cost savings can then be passe on to the consumer. Of course this creates a problem for the RCS vendors .....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17500930.post-54735154970835855072010-06-09T20:49:41.594+01:002010-06-09T20:49:41.594+01:00Hi Dean,
Multi-headed/aggregator apps are already...Hi Dean,<br /><br />Multi-headed/aggregator apps are already existing; eg eBuddy.<br /><br />I am not a fan or RCS either. Although operators could provide 'cloud service' for address book, presence, context-aware (incl mood-aware) profiles. I am not talking about the usual approaches but to enable the embedding of these in many applications, operator or otherwise.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17500930.post-47040494413993175412010-06-04T19:56:12.925+01:002010-06-04T19:56:12.925+01:00One reason could be aggregation; for the same reas...One reason could be aggregation; for the same reason I'm reading your blog via Google reader or getting an overview of twitter facebook feeds from my netvibes page or my friendstream on my HTC Legend.<br /><br />Getting an overview is surely useful if RCS is suitable is another story....Jonashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12192569516967781548noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17500930.post-87367079301995888502010-06-03T19:52:03.876+01:002010-06-03T19:52:03.876+01:00Hi,
We believe in RCS as enabler under a same com...Hi, <br />We believe in RCS as enabler under a same common user experience of a lot of different use cases.<br />A killer enabler (not app) all device tiers, all carriers, as it was the SMS in the past is needed in a more multimedia world.<br />We are working to make feasible the same success of past SMS for the coming RCS.<br />Mobility is not about smartphones and IT skilled geeks, the success means to provide a right experience to most of people. The same as Henry Ford did in the past, provide the "driving experience" to the masses<br /><br />http://www.solaiemes.com/index.php?id=94juanhttp://www.solaiemes.com/index.php?id=94noreply@blogger.com