Speaking Engagements & Private Workshops - Get Dean Bubley to present or chair your event

Need an experienced, provocative & influential telecoms keynote speaker, moderator/chair or workshop facilitator?
To discuss Dean Bubley's appearance at a specific event, contact information AT disruptive-analysis DOT com

Monday, July 16, 2007

Truphone - 1, T-Mobile - nil

OK, it's still just an "interim injunction" and I haven't seen the full details yet, but it looks like the wVoIP industry just scored first blood against the mobile incumbents with regard to interconnect.

I don't have time to go through all the ins & outs of this yet, but on first glance it looks like another step towards 3rd-party VoIP on mobile being given a chance to compete. Obviously there are arguments and counter-arguments on both sides, but from my point of view the fact that T-Mobile blocked access to numbers that their subscribers could reasonably expect to reach was a step too far. While I certainly appreciate the desire of operators not to subsidise WLAN-capable handsets & then see that subsidy used against them, the notion that they can just arbitrarily block outbound calls to number ranges they don't like is ridiculous.

And they made it worse by announcing to their users "You have dialled an incorrect number. Please check it & try again" - despite the inbound call coming from that very same number. If the recorded message had been honest and said "Sorry, you've tried calling a number from an operator we're still in negotiations/dispute with, please call from a non-T-Mobile phone" I would have cut them some slack.

On the other hand, if you want a well-argued contrarian viewpoint, Keith over at Telebusillis had this to say the other day


Anonymous said...

"the notion that they can just arbitrarily block outbound calls to number ranges they don't like is ridiculous"

why ridiculous?

Dean Bubley said...

Because UK consumers have 20+ years experience & expectation of being able to dial any E.164 number direct from any handset, irrespective of operator, country or fixed/mobile.

The only 'blocked' numbers I can think of are user-defined on corporate switchboards (eg restrictions on calling international) or parental control (eg premium-rate numbers)

To do anything which is blatantly counter to your users' reasonable expectations seems self-evidently ridiculous.

But perhaps I'm wrong - maybe T-Mobile should also consider blocking the phone numbers for Orange & Vodafone sales departments too. Or arbitrarily block the number of Truphone's lawyers' firm.