There's currently a lot of focus on regulation of technology platforms, because of concerns over monopoly power or privacy/data violations.
Speaking Engagements & Private Workshops - Get Dean Bubley to present or chair your event
Need an experienced, provocative & influential telecoms keynote speaker, moderator/chair or workshop facilitator?
To see recent presentations, and discuss Dean Bubley's appearance at a specific event, click here
Thursday, October 08, 2020
Platform regulation? Are you *sure*?
Labels:
5G,
competition,
government,
network slicing,
openRAN,
OTT,
platforms,
Policy,
regulation,
telcos
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
It's under scrutiny as part of the US Congress House Judiciary Committee report on antitrust
Other governments also focus on "platforms", especially Amazon, Facebook, Google, Apple and a few others.
Typically, traditional telcos cheer on these moves against companies they (still!) wrongly refer to as "OTTs".
Yet there's a paradox here. While there are indeed concerns about big-tech monopoly abuse that must be addressed by regulators... they're not the only platforms that could be captured by the law.
I've lost count of the times I've heard "the network as a platform", or 5G is a platform" with QoS, network slicing etc often hyped as the basis for the future economy.
Yet telcos can have as much lock-in as Apple or Amazon. I can't get an EE phone service on my Vodafone mobile connection. I can't port-out my call detail records & online behaviour to a new operator. There's no "smart home portability law" if I sign up to my broadband provider's service. Or slice portability laws for enterprises.